Socialism – Group Supremacist Ideology based on theft, jealousy, denial of consequences and Hatred of the Jew.

Socialism is but the latest, more benevolent sounding name for the Collectivist philosophy that holds the group to be more important than the individual – who can be sacrificed for “the greater good”.  It is invested with a false morality as an antidote to the immorality of the supposedly, “greedy, evil, God murdering, Dirty” Jew stigmatizing Capitalism.  

“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery…”
— Winston Churchill

“Socialism, in general, has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it.”  – Thomas Sowell

Socialism is parasitical and survives solely by theft.  
Socialism is the delusion of omnipotent central control over the unknowable and the moral ‘superiority’ to keep failing at it.
— Dr. Society

To achieve Central Planning you must be omnipotent and incorruptible, as there is an infinite amount of data and all must be processed and acted upon in real time.   No one person or committee ever is, even though they operate under that delusion.     Cuba’s economy has never worked.  When it exhausted the plunder of it’s citizens it survived only by the subsidies it received from the Soviet Union and later, Venezuela.  

Socialism can not sustain an economy.  Moving money from one person to another by force is not commerce or free trade/exchange which is a win/win.   In forced “redistribution” the people who pay for the government largess, always lose and eventually the Plunder runs out.   

America and England have collapsed their economies with Socialist policies and have replaced their Jewish/Christian values with Group Supremacist ones.   In line with Group supremacist values, the Soviet Union and China starved, executed and murdered millions of their people and in China every girl child.   The Communist’s Group Supremacist values have been taught in the USA for the last 40 years so that we were softened up to accept stealing from one group to fund another under the guise of charity and Social justice.  

What is the moral case for capitalism? It lies in recognition that socialism isn’t a great idea gone wrong – it’s an evil philosophy in action. It isn’t driven by altruism; it’s driven by greed and jealousy. Socialism states that you owe me something simply because I exist. Capitalism, by contrast, results in a sort of reality-forced altruism: I may not want to help you, I may dislike you, but if I don’t give you a product or service you want, I will starve. Voluntary exchange is more moral than forced redistribution. Socialism violates at least three of the Ten Commandments: It turns government into God, it legalizes thievery and it elevates covetousness. Discussions of income inequality, after all, aren’t about prosperity but about petty spite. Why should you care how much money I make, so long as you are happy? – Ben Shapiro – Why Socialism is on the Rise  

Aversion to Capitalism is Aversion to the Jew 

Why is money called the root of all evil?  Why are the rich hated and viewed as Greedy and evil?   Why do people consider Capitalism as something evil?  

For centuries, in the Christian world Capitalism was a Jewish occupation because usury/interest was forbidden by the Church.  Until Vatican II in the late 20th Century Jews were considered inherently evil due to the Catholic Church’s official position that Jews murdered God/Jesus. Capitalism was considered Jewish and therefore also evil and immoral.  

Without Capital neither business nor government can function and therefore the Jew was tolerated in lending and banking as long as states or kingdoms needed their Capital and banking skills to boost the economy.  Once the economy was functioning it was considered moral to exile the ‘greedy’ Jews, confiscate their property and re-distribute it.

Sound Familiar?  

Jew hatred, IMO is the reason behind aversion to Capitalism by Christians and self-hatred the reason why Secular Jews carry the same aversion.  Denial of Jewishness was a way to avoid Christian hatred of the Jew and be accepted as a citizen and part of society.  Denying Jewishness meant also denying Capitalism which , as Marx showed us in his essay on the Jewish Question, was considered Jewish.   It even showed in the German word Judentum, which meant both Jewishness/Judaism and commerce/capitalism in nineteenth century German.

Although the Jew hatred component of the aversion to Capitalism is minimized today, the association with greed, immorality and evil remains.  That’s why many secular Jews , including Bernie Sanders are in favor of Socialism.  They do not want to be hated or viewed as greedy, immoral and evil.   It is the reason Republicans and those in favor of Capitalism are viewed as greedy and accused of insensitivity to the poor.  It is why Democrats are told not to listen to Republicans because they are evil.    

The Karma, of Jew Hatred, is Socialism and Communism. – Dr. Society

“Read More ” »


The Theft, not the love, of Money is the root of all evil.

The income tax is immoral on many levels.
  • It permits the government nearly unlimited access to the people’s wealth.
  • It opens the door to inquisitorial intrusion into their private affairs.
  • And it introduces such complexity into the law that everyone is a potential criminal.
Three strikes—why isn’t it out?
Alas, something can be immoral and yet legal and constitutional. That’s the fix we’re in.”

The 16th Amendment gave the Federal Government the ability to steal your wealth which empowered the corruption in the US government.

Why do I say Theft and not “Contribution” to support the US government.  Because most of the taxes are not spent on programs that benefit the taxpayer directly.  Involuntary Confiscation of wealth without just compensation is theft.  Involuntary taking of property is theft even with just compensation.   Private companies can not take your property without your consent.  There are cases where an entire skyscraper has been built around a small house because the owners could not be forced to sell.
What if you like your house but the government needs it for a public reason like a railroad?   Is it just to force you out of your house even if they pay you market value?  What if something the government does (such as building a railroad or nuclear power plant next door to your house) lowers your property value?  Shouldn’t the government compensate you for damages?  Even if the answer is yes, the government must steal from taxpayers (since taxation is involuntary and paying for the damages to your property value, is not just compensation for the people whose money is taken, especially if taken from people who get no benefit from the Railroad or power plant). 
If the government used the proceeds from the tickets to the railroad or the charge for power generated from the Nuclear plant, then the people paying are getting just compensation.
But….What’s wrong with stealing?
Why is theft a crime?
Isn’t the robber just re-distributing wealth from the victim to himself and his family?
If that is too selfish to be a justification for theft, what if  the theft benefits society?
What if the robber gives half the money, he stole, to charity?
What if theft gets his family off the welfare roles?
What if the robber steals from a thief?
These are rationalizations people may use to excuse theft.  Involuntary taking of wealth/property is theft.   
These reasons may only be valid to take into account when determining the sentence. 
When a person steals food because they are hungry and have no other recourse, they are still stealing however Justice says that the punishment must be mitigated by mercy and compassion.   In today’s society there are food banks and shelters, so even that excuse does not apply.
What if the government does the above?
What about conquest of other lands that benefit your society at the expense of lives and property of the other society?
What if the government takes your house without your permission but pays double the market value? (hint: it is still wrong)

It is certainly NOT OK,  for a person or the government, to steal, to give charity or for any other reason.

In any case, no matter the supposed reason,  Government stealing is motivated by buying votes.
If  Foundational American Values are our standard, then forcible taking of wealth is wrong and a crime.
Most of us agree that an individual does not have the right to use force to steal your wallet to give to the poor.  But what if the majority agrees that we can use collective force to take your wallet to give to the poor. (taxation for social services).   Is the collective force of law acceptable  when the use of force individually would be a crime?

Frederic Bastiat  in “The Law.” answers, that law is the collective organization of the individual right to defense of  his person, liberty, and property.   If every individual has this right, then it follows that a group of individuals have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights.

This common force, is an agent of the individuals and acts as a substitute for the individuals.   Therefore, if I can’t individually use force against your person, liberty or property, then neither can my agent, who acts as me.   

What is Justice
Justice does not favor the poor or the rich. 
Our judicial system prosecutes those who violate the law.  The law is written according to the collective organization of our endowed rights and the Constitution which protects the rights of the people.  Justice is guaranteeing the natural rights of the people and prosecuting those who violate them.  When law and Constitution are out of sync, there is no justice.  So called “Social Justice” is not Justice.  Entitlements are not just.  There is no natural right to wealth.  No rights have been violated to justify the government stealing one person title to wealth to entitle another that has not earned it through trade.  The taxpayer is not a criminal and the poor person not a victim of a crime that the taxpayer’s wealth should be removed by force and redistributed. 
So, the Politicians of the US have created a victim culture – for the poor, and for blacks and minorities – and equated re-distribution (which is theft) of the imagined oppressor with compensation for damages to the victim class.   It sounds like Communism, because it is.  Communism and all collective philosophies divide the people into oppressor and oppressed and group people into classes. 
The scam of stealing for “Social Justice” in a nutshell:
Social Justice, redistributing earned wealth to those who have not earned it, rewards sloth, laziness, incompetence and a victim culture, of entitlement without effort justified by  jealousy and anger.  It is patently unfair to the earner and is not justice.
I , Uncle Sam, stand on a corner and see a poor family asking for help. 
I want to help them but I am a government.   I have no money, of my own, and no way to earn any.
The money I do have is given to me by the people to protect them and get them their mail. 
It’s up to the people, who have money, to help the poor.
But I want to buy votes to be benevolent.  I see that not everyone who passed by give money.  This is not fair, I say.    
Everyone who has money should pay.  So I , Uncle Sam, pick the pockets and steal the money from all the passers-by, to give to the homeless.
Even from the ones that are already giving money.
The Homeless are grateful to their kind Uncle Sam and will vote for me.

Socialist philosophy on taxes

In the Constitution, Federal taxes are for services performed for the general welfare such as the military. The taxes are levied on the States and apportioned by the amount of representation the State has in the Federal Government.  The states collect the tax from their residents.

In Socialist philosophy taxes are for equalizing wealth and power and are apportioned based on the amount of profit a business makes or the amount of income an individual earns.

Profit is looked upon as taking advantage of the consumer and an unfair taking of wealth.

In their Jealousy based philosophy, it’s not fair to be rich while others are poor.  It’s not fair to be powerful while others are weak.   Hence they tax profit and minimize success.  In foreign policy they weaken the United States down to the European and third world level.

Our tax system is purely socialist.   Profit is penalized.  Non-profit is tax exempt.   A non-profit pays for electricity and other services.  Why should they be exempt from paying for government services?   Everyone rightfully should pay for services like military protection without exemption.   The catch is that only a small percentage of our taxes go to pay for services.  The bulk is  “re-distributed”.  Tax exempt in our current system means you didn’t commit the “crime” of making a profit so you don’t have to re-distribute.   But for that exemption the government gets to control you and make sure you cooperate with their agenda.


Kuai we don’t need the government

A great example of  Why we don’t need the government when our local communities can do the job without the massive theft and waste of the Government.

A Kuai community completed repair work that the State government said would take two million dollars and four years in 8 DAYS with volunteers at NO COST TO TAXPAYERS.


Contrasting Philosophies – The Middle East

Israel and the Jews
Socialists view powerful Countries as oppressors or Occupiers. 
When little Israel was up against the powerful Arab countries that surrounded it, the Socialist world sided with poor weak Israel.
However when Israel's military in 1967 proved to be more powerful than they thought, Israel's status changed in the eyes of the Socialist. Taking advantage of this Socialist blind spot, the powerful Islamic countries who fund and support the terrorists hide behind the facade of "Palestinian refugees" so that Israel stays more powerful by comparison and loses the Socialist World's support as the Oppressor.
That is why Hitler had to create propaganda that made the Jews seem to be in control of the world and it's wealth. If so , the Jews were Powerful and Germany the weak victim. Thus it was morally justified to beat up, exclude, deport and ultimately kill the Jews.
Under Foundational American Values (FAV)  we see the "Palestinians" as they are; brainwashed Islamic Fundamentalists who are wrong because they are using terrorism to kill innocents and wish to commit genocide on all Jews and destroy Israel.  It is immoral and there is no excuse based on supposed victimhood. 
"Palestinians" are actually Arab refugees who were intentionally excluded from Jordan.  They were renamed "Palestinians" in 1967 as part of the propaganda war against Israel.
Israel is our ally and the only free country in the Middle East. We defend our allies. 
Why is the word Terrorism not used in the Media?
If Homicide Bombers are on the weaker side then they are considered by the Socialist Philosophy to be using the only means available to fight their more powerful enemy (by definition an oppressor).  They are morally excused for blowing up innocent Israeli Women and children because they are oppressed and are merely fighting the power.
That's why the Socialist Media will not refer to them as Terrorists.  In their judgment they are only freedom fighters.   However when the military of a powerful country fights back and there are civilian casualties (even if held as human shields) that country is called Terrorist. 
Why we butt heads on the Solution to Islamic Terrorism 
Aware Americans understand that Islamic Terrorism is motivated solely by the Terrorist's religious beliefs.  Islamic Terrorists are trained and conditioned to believe Islam is the only true religion and that all non Muslims must convert, submit to Muslim rule and pay tribute – if they believe in one G-d – or die.   So called "Radical" Islam justifies mass murder of even women and children as self defense.  All land conquered by Muslims is Muslim land forever.  Any other people on the land are trespassing and invading and so are not to be considered innocent but rather as soldiers.  Violating treaties, lying, prostitution, imprisonment, drugs, child porn and abuse, kidnapping, torture, rape, dismemberment, mass murder and any heinous crime is justified as long as it furthers Islam.  The ends justify the means. 
To the Socialist there is no such thing as Islamic Terrorism.  The Socialist views what we call terrorists as poor oppressed people fighting for land, freedom or rights who would stop fighting if only we provide economic opportunity and build roads and schools. They do not perceive that Islamic terrorists are not poor and consider dying to be martyrdom and a quick way to Paradise. What they want is not prosperity but rather conversion to Islam and world dominance.
The real solution is to defeat their religion, change their regime and morality and maintain superior power. 
And the same solution applies not just to Socialism but also to Islamic Terrorism 🙂
A new generation not raised on hate propaganda is essential.
To accomplish this Israel must restore their control of all territory including the West Bank and Gaza. They can install a Muslim Police Force backed by Israeli Police to keep order. To stop Jihad and terrorism instill that Islamic dominance of the world is somewhere far in the future and must come about without coercion to be valid. Teach that Terrorist suicide is not martyrdom but instead is just suicide and puts the perpetrator in Muslim hell. Reward compliance with work and free passage. Prosecute Muslims under their own rigid Islamic law.